A One Health approach to disease prevention and control recognises the close interaction between people, animals and their shared environment.
© Shutterstock/Dietmar Temps

Unequal investment distribution in One Health Networks

A new research paper by scientists at the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) has examined the global distribution of existing One Health Networks and found that investment in these networks has not been equitably distributed.

Since the term One Health emerged in the early 2000s, efforts to operationalise a One Health approach at global, regional, and national levels have increased. Governments, academic institutions and non-government organisations have implemented a One Health ethos and formalised these commitments to cross-sectoral and intersectoral collaborations through One Health platforms, networks, steering committees and task forces.

A One Health approach to disease prevention and control recognises the close interaction between people, animals and their shared environment.

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen increased focus on the threat of emerging diseases at the human–animal–environment interface.

As such, investments in One Health collaborations are expected to increase at local, national and international levels in order to effectively tackle emerging, re-emerging and endemic diseases.

Analysis of the operations of global One Health Networks is useful to assess their efficiency, avoid duplication of effort, and ensure appropriate and timely allocation of resources.

A recent research study by Athman Mwatondo and colleagues at the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) in Nairobi, Kenya, found that more One Health Networks are formed and headquartered in Europe than in any other region. The study was published in the scientific journal The Lancet in February.

According to the study, emerging infections and novel pathogens were the priority focus area for most One Health Networks, with fewer networks focusing on other important hazards and pressing threats to health security.

Imbalances in One Health Network priorities and investments

With regard to One Health collaborations, the study found low diversity in stakeholder and sector representation.

This, the study authors argue, is an impediment to effective and equitable One Health Network formation and contributes to other imbalances in network priorities and investments.

The study therefore calls for the development of a database or repository of One Health Networks world-wide. This will facilitate greater understanding of the existing resource allocation and distribution patterns among global One Health Networks and thus ensure more focused efforts and equitable resource allocation to the networks and communities that need them most.



Reference:Mwatondo, A., Rahman-Shepherd, A., Hollmann, L., Chiossi, S., Maina, J., Kurup, K.K., Hassan, O.A., Coates, B., Khan, M., Spencer, J., Mutono, N., Thumbi, S.M., Muturi, M., Mutunga, M., Arruda, L.B., Akhbari, M., Ettehad, D., Ntoumi, F., Scott, T.P., Nel, L.H., Ellis-Iversen, J., Sönksen, U.W., Onyango, D., Ismail, Z., Simachew, K., Wolking, D., Kazwala, R., Sijali, Z., Bett, B., Heymann, D., Kock, R., Zumla, A. and Dar, O. 2023. A global analysis of One Health Networks and the proliferation of One Health collaborations. Lancet 401(10376): 605–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01596-3


News Comments

Add a comment


Name is required!

Enter valid name

Valid email is required!

Enter valid email address

Comment is required!

Google Captcha Is Required!

You have reached the limit for comments!

* These fields are required.

Comments :

  • user
    Dr Wilhelm Schack March 29, 2023 At 10:34 am
    Please inform me about One Health Networks in Africa, especially so in Southern Africa.