Acute food insecurity and malnutrition remain alarmingly high
Acute food insecurity and malnutrition levels remain alarmingly high and deeply entrenched, with crises increasingly concentrated in a core group of countries, according to the Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC) 2026, released on April 24th by the Global Network Against Food Crises. In its tenth edition, the GRFC shows that acute hunger has doubled over the past decade, with two famines declared last year for the first time in the report’s history.
Acute food insecurity – ten countries in focus
The report reveals that acute food insecurity remains highly concentrated. Ten countries – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Sudan, Sudan, the Syrian Arab Republic and Yemen – accounted for two-thirds of all people facing high levels of acute hunger. Afghanistan, South Sudan, Sudan and Yemen experienced the largest food crises regarding the share and absolute number of people facing high levels of acute food insecurity.
At the most extreme end, famine was identified in Gaza Governorate and parts of Sudan in 2025 by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system, marking the first time since the GRFC began reporting that famine has been confirmed in two separate contexts in the same year. This signals a sharp escalation in the most extreme forms of hunger and malnutrition, driven primarily by conflict and restricted humanitarian access, and exacerbated by forced displacement, the report states.
Severity of acute food insecurity the second highest on record
According to the report, in 2025, 266 million people in 47 countries/territories experienced high levels of acute food insecurity. The severity of acute food insecurity was the second highest on record, with the share of people facing extreme hunger remaining at one of the most critical levels seen in the past two decades. Nine times more people are facing catastrophic hunger (IPC Phase 5) than in 2016.
At the same time, acute malnutrition remains a critical and growing concern. In 2025 alone, 35.5 million children were acutely malnourished, including nearly ten million suffering from severe acute malnutrition. Nearly half of food-crisis contexts also faced nutrition crises, reflecting the combined effects of inadequate diets, disease burden and breakdowns in essential services. In the most severe contexts, including Gaza, Myanmar, South Sudan and Sudan, these compounded shocks have resulted in extreme levels of malnutrition and elevated risks of mortality.
More than 85 million people forcibly displaced
In addition, forced displacement continued to exacerbate food insecurity. More than 85 million people were forcibly displaced across food-crisis contexts in 2025, including internally displaced people, asylum-seekers and refugees with people forced to flee consistently facing higher levels of acute hunger than host communities.
“Conflict remains the primary driver of acute food insecurity and malnutrition for millions around the world, with outright famine emerging in two conflict-affected areas in the same year – an unprecedented development,” says United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres in the foreword to the report. “This report is a call to action urging global leaders to summon the political will to rapidly scale up investment in lifesaving aid, and work to end the conflicts that inflict so much suffering on so many.”
Outlook for 2026 remains bleak
Looking ahead, the report warns that severe levels of acute food insecurity remain critical in multiple contexts in 2026. Ongoing conflicts, climate variability and global economic uncertainty – including risks to food markets – are likely to sustain or worsen conditions in many countries.
In particular, while a full assessment is premature, the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East – in addition to causing further displacement in a region already hosting millions of forcibly displaced and returnees – exposes countries/territories with food crises to both direct and indirect risks of global agrifood market disruptions.
Immediate food security implications are mainly regional, given the Middle East’s dependence on food imports, but are having immediate impacts on the purchasing power of already-vulnerable communities as energy and logistics costs rise. At the same time, Gulf countries are major energy and fertiliser exporters, and continued transport disruptions could create wider spillover risks for global agrifood markets, the report warns.
Declining funding threatens response capacity
This year’s report also highlights the sharp decline in humanitarian and development financing for food crises. Funding for food crises responses and for food security and nutrition has fallen back to levels last seen nearly a decade ago, limiting the ability of governments and humanitarian actors to respond effectively. Data collection has also been impacted, with fewer countries able to produce reliable and disaggregated food security and nutrition estimates.
Call to action
The Global Network Against Food Crises underscores that food and nutrition crises are no longer temporary shocks but persistent, predictable and increasingly concentrated in protracted contexts. Addressing them requires boosting sustained, coordinated action that reduces humanitarian needs, builds resilience and tackles root causes. Governments, donors, international financial institutions and partners must scale up investment in resilient agrifood systems, climate adaptation, rural livelihoods and inclusive economic opportunities, while strengthening early warning systems and enabling anticipatory action, the GNAFC claims. Preventing the most severe outcomes, including famine, also depends on ensuring safe humanitarian access, upholding international humanitarian law and reinforcing political commitment to address conflict-driven hunger.
The Global Network Against Food Crises (GNAFC) is an international alliance which has set itself the goal of addressing food crises with evidence-based actions proven to deliver impact. It includes the United Nations, the European Union, the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), the Government of Ireland, the Group of Seven Plus (g7+) as well as governmental and non-governmental agencies.
(GNAFC/sri)
More information:
Global Network Against Food Crises
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system



